Is It Legal For South Carolina Traffic Courts To Give Police The Power Of Preosecuting Attorney’s?
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
This is true. If you are pulled over for a DUI, speeding, littering, etc. When you go to court there is no solicitor, only you and the police officer who has the power of a prosecuting attorney, before the judge. The judge follows the suggestions of the police officer. To verify what I am saying is true, call any traffic court in SC.
I got pulled over for throwing a Cigarette butt out the window, which is considered littering. The state fine is $200.00, but the police officer suggested to the judge $540.00, so I had to pay or go to jail. Speeding 20 miles over the speed limit or speeding thrpugh a school zone is a lesser fine.
If you answer, please no lectures on smoking or littering!!!
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
- Related posts on attorneys
- What The Kids Don’t Know
- Personal Injury Lawyer - Choosing the Right Attorney
- Canada People Search
- Related posts on Carolina
- Live Streaming Florida Panthers Vs Carolina Hurricanes NHL, Watch …
- How Many Years Will It Take For South Carolina To Build A Team …
- “State Sites” for North Carolina, Missouri, and Pennsylvania Now …
- Related posts on Courts
- Federal Court's decision on Perak MB; a good one? « The People's …
- Fon Du Lac Racket & Fitness ,Fond Du Lac – Tennis Courts-Private …
- OHS and the death of Brodie Panluck from bullying « SafetyAtWorkBlog
Tags: car accident lawyer, auto accident lawyer, dui lawyer, attorney
Tagged with: attorneys • Carolina • Courts • Give • Legal • police • Power • Preosecuting • South • Traffic
Filed under: attorney FAQ
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!

Actually this seems to be an advantage to the prosecutor.
You argue that they may lie and you believe some prosecutors don’t?
The advantage is the police officers don’t know evidence rules and aren’t sophisticated in court room rpocedure..this is better than going against a seasoned attorney,
It seems SC doesn’t want to devote prosecutoral resources to traffic citations
It appears the JUDGE is the prosecuting atty, which is standard in most states for traffic issues. He looks at the evidence, questions the witness and makes decisions based on the information and evidence presented to him.
IMHO I don’t think you’ll convince anyone the SC traffic system is illegal or unconstitutional.
A very simple gesture can cause so much pain….
Sorry to hear of this situation…
hmmm this seems to suck!
i think something like this is comming ion to force soon in UK also.
police will be able to proscecute and on the spot fines as well.